Anuraag Rath's picture
7

Anuraag Rath

ChaoticEconomist

AI & ML interests

Agentic Orchestration, Fine Tuning, Reinforcement Learning, Game Theoretic Models

Recent Activity

reacted to kanaria007's post with ❀️ about 6 hours ago
βœ… Article highlight: *From LLM Wrappers to SIL: A Migration Cookbook* (art-60-067, v0.1) TL;DR: This article is a practical migration path from today’s LLM-heavy systems to governed SI-Core operation. The key move is simple: stop letting the LLM *effect* the world directly. First make it a proposal engine. Then add an effect ledger, rollback, goal objects, auditable prompts, and finally move critical logic into SIL. No rewrite requiredβ€”just a safer commit path, step by step. Read: https://huggingface.co/datasets/kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols/blob/main/article/60-supplements/art-60-067-from-llm-wrappers-to-sil.md Why it matters: β€’ gives a realistic migration path for teams that cannot stop shipping β€’ separates LLM proposal from runtime commit authority β€’ shows how governance can be added incrementally before full SIL adoption β€’ turns β€œwrap the model and hope” into phased risk reduction What’s inside: β€’ a phase map from raw LLM ops β†’ proposal engine β†’ effect ledger β†’ goal objects β†’ prompt auditability β†’ SIL-native core β€’ typed *ActionBundle* outputs instead of direct tool calls β€’ effect-ledger + rollback-floor patterns with idempotency and compensators β€’ goal objects that make objectives computable instead of hidden in prompts β€’ guidance on where SIL pays rent first: policy gates, routing, budgets, rollback planning, and commit checks Key idea: Do not migrate by rewriting everything. Migrate by moving **commit authority** first, then gradually moving **logic** into structured, replayable, checkable forms. *LLMs can keep proposing. SI-Core must decide what is admissible to commit.*
View all activity

Organizations

srm institute of science and technology's profile picture