AI & ML interests
Agentic Orchestration, Fine Tuning, Reinforcement Learning, Game Theoretic Models
Recent Activity
reacted to mrmanna's post with β€οΈ about 6 hours ago ππ & π¦π§ππ§π π πππππ‘π
ππ©πΊ ππ³π°π₯πΆπ€π΅πͺπ°π― ππ¦π¨πͺπ―π΄ ππ©π¦π³π¦ ππ°πΊ ππ¨π¦π―π΅π΄ ππ―π₯
Published: 18 Apr 2026 | Towards AI Publication | Medium
Open Link: https://medium.com/towards-artificial-intelligence/ai-state-machine-106387406c5a?sk=047b2f064c673a0095a9e8cc011b6a92
We talk a lot about governance, accuracy, and auditability in AI agents.
But I keep seeing a gap between the words and the engineering behind them.
Many agents have tools, orchestration, memory, graphs, and impressive demos. But when you ask how governance is actually enforced, the answer is often weak.
Prompt-level control is not production governance.
A production agent needs explicit state design: legal transitions, controlled progression, recovery paths, approval boundaries, and separation between memory, decision, policy, and execution.
This article explores the silent crisis unfolding in modern AI development: the urgent need to resurrect the disciplined architecture of state machines
reacted to kanaria007's post with β€οΈ about 6 hours ago β
Article highlight: *From LLM Wrappers to SIL: A Migration Cookbook* (art-60-067, v0.1)
TL;DR:
This article is a practical migration path from todayβs LLM-heavy systems to governed SI-Core operation.
The key move is simple: stop letting the LLM *effect* the world directly. First make it a proposal engine. Then add an effect ledger, rollback, goal objects, auditable prompts, and finally move critical logic into SIL. No rewrite requiredβjust a safer commit path, step by step.
Read:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols/blob/main/article/60-supplements/art-60-067-from-llm-wrappers-to-sil.md
Why it matters:
β’ gives a realistic migration path for teams that cannot stop shipping
β’ separates LLM proposal from runtime commit authority
β’ shows how governance can be added incrementally before full SIL adoption
β’ turns βwrap the model and hopeβ into phased risk reduction
Whatβs inside:
β’ a phase map from raw LLM ops β proposal engine β effect ledger β goal objects β prompt auditability β SIL-native core
β’ typed *ActionBundle* outputs instead of direct tool calls
β’ effect-ledger + rollback-floor patterns with idempotency and compensators
β’ goal objects that make objectives computable instead of hidden in prompts
β’ guidance on where SIL pays rent first: policy gates, routing, budgets, rollback planning, and commit checks
Key idea:
Do not migrate by rewriting everything.
Migrate by moving **commit authority** first, then gradually moving **logic** into structured, replayable, checkable forms.
*LLMs can keep proposing. SI-Core must decide what is admissible to commit.* View all activity Organizations