Hugging Face's logo
Lucas Silva 's picture
25 1 35

Lucas Silva PRO

YuLexuan30
Fataj's profile picture Chucho-1012's profile picture f5139's profile picture
·

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

new activity about 3 hours ago
multimodalart/nano-banana:Developer mode enabled, please disable
reacted to blanchon's post with 🚀 about 4 hours ago
I'm releasing OpenCS2 a 11TB dataset of around 5000 hours of counter strike gameplay recording. - HD resolution - 1280×720 · 32 fps - For each frame keyboard and mouse + world state (player position, velocity, weapon ...) - HD Stereo audio - All 10 players perspective https://huggingface.co/collections/blanchon/opencs2
reacted to Imosu's post with 👀 about 8 hours ago
# ZeroGPU Hardware Mismatch: Why Am I Getting RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell MIG Instead of the Documented H200? I recently ran into a surprising issue while debugging a Hugging Face ZeroGPU Space. According to the Hugging Face ZeroGPU documentation, ZeroGPU is described as using NVIDIA H200-based resources, with configurations such as “large” and “xlarge” offering H200-class memory. However, when I printed the actual GPU information inside my Space, I got something different: ```txt GPU: NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition MIG 2g.48gb Capability: (12, 0) Torch: 2.8.0+cu128 CUDA: 12.8 This is not an H200. It appears to be a MIG slice of an RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition GPU, with 48GB VRAM. This difference matters. It is not just a cosmetic hardware-name issue. In my case, the Space was running Qwen3-TTS and failed with: CUDA error: no kernel image is available for execution on the device The issue appears related to GPU architecture compatibility. The app was using kernels-community/flash-attn3, which is generally aligned with Hopper-class GPUs such as H100/H200, but the actual device exposed to the Space was Blackwell with compute capability 12.0. As a result, CUDA kernels that might work on the expected H200 environment failed on the actual assigned GPU. To be clear, I am not saying the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a bad GPU. It is a newer architecture and may be powerful in many workloads. But it is not the same as H200, and the software ecosystem compatibility is different. For ML workloads, especially those relying on custom CUDA kernels, the exact GPU architecture matters a lot. This raises a few questions: Is Hugging Face ZeroGPU now assigning RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell MIG instances instead of H200 instances? If yes, why is this not clearly documented?
View all activity

Organizations

lorafrenzi's profile picture