Papers
arxiv:2608.22614

What AstroPT knows about galaxies, and what that can teach us about LLMs

Published on Aug 23
· Submitted by
Mike Smith
on Aug 25
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Using a galaxy-image transformer with known physical concept ordering, the study shows that linear probes recover real structure and that concepts emerge in a fixed difficulty-based sequence during training.

Interpretability research increasingly asks when concepts emerge during training and whether linear probes recover real structure, but in language models these claims are hard to validate because language offers little ground-truth ordering of concepts or relationships among them. We propose the use of astronomical ground truth through AstroPT, a transformer trained on millions of galaxy images, as a calibration testbed. AstroPT is an LLM-like model trained within a domain where the difficulty ordering of concepts and the relations among them are known in advance. Probing frozen representations across checkpoints, layers, model sizes, and objective choices, we find that galaxy properties emerge in a fixed order that tracks their known difficulty---quantities written almost directly into the pixels (band magnitude) become decodable early in training and shallow in the network, while multiband/spectra based and inferred quantities (such as redshift and specific star formation rate) emerge later and deeper. This order is invariant to our tested training objectives, and scales in magnitude but not in sequence with capacity. Our linear probe directions further recover the known physical structure among galaxy properties. Our findings suggest that astronomy offers a controlled sandbox for calibrating mechanistic interpretability methods we otherwise apply to LLMs blind.

Community

Large language models are hard to interpret in part because their training data is broad, messy, and not grounded in known relations. Scientific foundation models promise a cleaner setting. In astronomy, many relationships in the data are already known from theory, observation, and long-standing empirical work. This perspective permits us to ask two questions which we attempt to answer in this work: when such a model is trained, does its hidden space recover known scientific structure? And can we use that structure as a tool to probe the model’s learning dynamics and internalized knowledge?

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.22614
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22614 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22614 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.22614 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.