IFM/K2-Horizon-7B-GGUF
Text Generation • 9B • Updated • 14
Carlo Moro PRO
cnmoro
AI & ML interests
Retrieval & Small Models & PTBR Resources
Recent Activity
liked a model about 8 hours ago
IFM/K2-Horizon-7B-GGUF liked a model about 8 hours ago
IFM/K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B-GGUF upvoted a collection about 8 hours ago
K2 HorizonOrganizations
liked 2
models about 8 hours ago
upvoted a collection about 8 hours ago
reacted to RiverRider's post with 👍 4 days ago
Post
1767
A 339 KB linear probe on frozen features beats the fine-tuned baseline on ChestX-ray14.
Linear(5376, 14) on frozen google/gemma-4-31B-it hidden states. No fine-tuning, no radiology pretraining, no augmentation. All 112,120 images, official test_list.txt.
Wang et al. 2017, ResNet-50 fine-tuned end to end 0.7451
this probe, frozen backbone + linear head 0.7590
view-position only (shortcut baseline) 0.5896
shuffled labels (refit floor) 0.5002
Ahead on 12 of 14 findings.
The comparison is split-matched, and that took care to get right. The number everyone quotes, CheXNet's 0.8414, is on a different test set: their own random 70/10/20 partition, not the official list. Do not compare 0.7590 to it. The matched row is from Wang's v5 appendix, added specifically to report the published split. I had this wrong in our own code for a day, quoting a cross-split reference as a head-to-head, which is the error worth not repeating in public.
Three controls, because a bare AUROC here is not interpretable. Shuffled labels catch leakage. View-only catches the shortcut, since portable AP films are taken of sicker patients, and it is folded, because Hernia's raw view-only of 0.3436 is really 0.6564 of shortcut once flipped. Intervals resample patients and not images, since the test split is 25,596 films from 2,797 patients.
Banked negatives are on the card too. Max-pooling and top-16 pooling were predicted to help focal findings and did the opposite, costing 0.0537 and 0.0225. Readout depth barely matters, 0.7600 to 0.7605.
Scope: detection, not early detection. Research artifact, not a diagnostic device.
The backbone never runs in the demo. What ships is the reading.
Space: RiverRider/srt-cxr14-probe
Model: RiverRider/srt-cxr14-linear-probe
Data + states: RiverRider/srt-cxr14-frozen-probe
Linear(5376, 14) on frozen google/gemma-4-31B-it hidden states. No fine-tuning, no radiology pretraining, no augmentation. All 112,120 images, official test_list.txt.
Wang et al. 2017, ResNet-50 fine-tuned end to end 0.7451
this probe, frozen backbone + linear head 0.7590
view-position only (shortcut baseline) 0.5896
shuffled labels (refit floor) 0.5002
Ahead on 12 of 14 findings.
The comparison is split-matched, and that took care to get right. The number everyone quotes, CheXNet's 0.8414, is on a different test set: their own random 70/10/20 partition, not the official list. Do not compare 0.7590 to it. The matched row is from Wang's v5 appendix, added specifically to report the published split. I had this wrong in our own code for a day, quoting a cross-split reference as a head-to-head, which is the error worth not repeating in public.
Three controls, because a bare AUROC here is not interpretable. Shuffled labels catch leakage. View-only catches the shortcut, since portable AP films are taken of sicker patients, and it is folded, because Hernia's raw view-only of 0.3436 is really 0.6564 of shortcut once flipped. Intervals resample patients and not images, since the test split is 25,596 films from 2,797 patients.
Banked negatives are on the card too. Max-pooling and top-16 pooling were predicted to help focal findings and did the opposite, costing 0.0537 and 0.0225. Readout depth barely matters, 0.7600 to 0.7605.
Scope: detection, not early detection. Research artifact, not a diagnostic device.
The backbone never runs in the demo. What ships is the reading.
Space: RiverRider/srt-cxr14-probe
Model: RiverRider/srt-cxr14-linear-probe
Data + states: RiverRider/srt-cxr14-frozen-probe
- 3 replies
liked a
model 6 days ago
liked a
model 10 days ago
liked a
model 11 days ago
liked a
model 14 days ago
liked a
model 15 days ago
upvoted a collection 16 days ago
liked a
model 16 days ago
liked a
model 17 days ago
liked a
model 20 days ago
liked a
model 21 days ago
liked 2
models 22 days ago
liked a
Space 23 days ago
updated a
Space 23 days ago
published a
Space 23 days ago
liked a
model 24 days ago
